-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
use gcr.io/k8s-staging-test-infra instead of gcr.io/k8s-testimages #278
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
use gcr.io/k8s-staging-test-infra instead of gcr.io/k8s-testimages #278
Conversation
Welcome @liangyuanpeng! |
Hi @liangyuanpeng. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-csi member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/ok-to-test |
@msau42 Could you help check whether this image meets the current csi usage requirements? You modified the namespace of the image in the following PR, but it seems that you only want to upgrade the image version? ok github.com/kubernetes-csi/external-provisioner/v5/pkg/capacity 26.314s
--- FAIL: TestNodeTopology (60.41s)
--- FAIL: TestNodeTopology/change-labels (60.00s)
nodes_test.go:551: unexpected error: get informers in sync: timed out waiting for the condition
FAIL
FAIL github.com/kubernetes-csi/external-provisioner/v5/pkg/capacity/topology 60.860s |
/release-note-none |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: liangyuanpeng, xing-yang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
The CVE is fixed. Please rebase. |
Signed-off-by: Lan Liang <[email protected]>
fe82c7d
to
5ec1a52
Compare
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
/retest STEP: Destroying namespace "volume-expand-7977" for this suite. @ 07/09/25 13:00:22.832
<< Timeline
[FAILED] While waiting for pvc to have fs resizing condition: error waiting for pvc "hostpath.csi.k8s.iojtcqb" to have filesystem resize status: error fetching pvc "hostpath.csi.k8s.iojtcqb" for checking for resize status : client rate limiter Wait returned an error: rate: Wait(n=1) would exceed context deadline
In [It] at: k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/testsuites/volume_expand.go:238 @ 07/09/25 13:00:17.596
|
/retest WARNING: DATA RACE
Read at 0x00c0005cd380 by goroutine 233: |
csi-release-tools/pull-test.sh Line 34 in 74e066a
Seems like it's using @gnufied I see that you have opened a PR: kubernetes/test-infra#35116 for this case, could you please confirm that? thanks. |
087c1fd
to
5ec1a52
Compare
/retest |
@liangyuanpeng: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
releated:
fixes #277
It seems that this place was treated correctly before? But why did it recover? I haven't checked the history yet.